For years, Jamal Murray built a reputation as one of the NBA’s top playoff risers. Throughout multiple postseason runs with the Denver Nuggets, Murray consistently elevated his play in high-pressure situations.
However, during Denver’s disappointing first-round exit against the Minnesota Timberwolves, this version of Murray never appeared. Though Murray had multiple 30-point games in the series, his efficiency did not reflect consistent production.
Now, after one of the most underwhelming playoff performances of his career, fans are trying to understand what went wrong for Murray. Nuggets owner Josh Kroenke made it clear that no one besides Nikola Jokić is untouchable. If so, Murray’s struggles could cause major implications for his future in Denver.
The Reputation of Playoff Murray
Before the 2025-26 playoffs, Murray’s postseason averages were 23.7 points (46% FG, 38% 3PT, 90% FT), 6.0 assists, and 4.9 rebounds over 79 games.
Much of his playoff reputation comes from the NBA bubble in 2020, where the Nuggets came back from two 3-1 leads. Murray had multiple 50-point games against the Utah Jazz alone. Though the Nuggets lost to the Los Angeles Lakers in the conference finals, Murray cemented his status as a playoff performer.
Murray is known as a clutch scorer throughout his career and especially in the playoffs. During the 2023-24 first round against the Lakers, Murray hit two game-winners. The Nuggets went on to win this series 4-1. During Game 5, Murray was dealing with a calf injury but still managed to score 32 points and hit the game-winner, closing out the series.
Throughout Denver’s recent playoff runs, they have consistently relied on Murray in late-game situations because of his ability to deliver in critical moments. When this expected version of Murray is not present, the Nuggets face many challenges in the postseason.
Murray’s Struggles this Postseason
During the first round versus the Timberwolves, Murray averaged 23.7 points (36% FG, 26% 3PT, 98% FT), 5.7 assists, and 5.0 rebounds over 6 games.
Initially, these numbers may not seem concerning. However, Murray’s efficiency tells a much different story. This season, Murray was top ten in three-point percentage, shooting 44%. Yet it did not translate to the postseason as he shot 26% from the three-point line. He was missing an abundance of shots he usually would make. This was evident by his 25% shooting on wide-open threes. Without his shooting, the Nuggets struggled as a team to score.
As mentioned, Murray is heavily relied on by the Nuggets in the clutch. In the first round, the Nuggets were dealing with injuries to Peyton Watson and Aaron Gordon, causing even more reliance on Murray. When in the clutch this postseason, Murray attempted seven shots. This was ranked in the top ten as of May 10th for leaders in clutch field goals attempted. Though he took seven shots, Murray did not make any.
After Murray made his first all-star appearance this season, his playoff struggles came as a surprise to many. Given how dominant he looked throughout the regular season, it was unexpected to see such a drastic decline in efficiency.
Murray’s Future With Denver
Following an underwhelming first round, questions are beginning to emerge about what this postseason means for Murray and the Nuggets moving forward.
With Kroenke expressing that everyone is available besides Jokić, the Nuggets may look completely different next season. Still, it may be difficult for the franchise to break up the Jokić and Murray duo after years of success together. But this may be what is holding them back from another finals appearance.
Murray is coming off one of the best seasons of his career, showing his continued ability to improve. The Nuggets faced numerous challenges this season, with many new pieces on the roster and unfortunate injury luck. While the team’s struggles cannot be placed solely on Murray, his role as a leader naturally comes with added responsibility.
Ultimately, Denver’s next steps depend on whether or not the organization believes Murray can still compete at a championship level.
Leave a comment