An owner in the NFL is an investor. Every organizational hire is made with the intent to make the team as competitive and profitable as possible. Millions of dollars will be spent on a legendary former MVP or on the sixth pick in the draft in hopes of making a team more successful. Therefore, when an owner is unable to see their legendary QB or phenom wide receiver play, the investment fails.
Generational players are built around and highlighted when constructing a roster. Every decision is based on how to protect and get the most out of those impactful players. So why wouldn’t the same care be placed on where the team plays?
MetLife Stadium has been a purge on the lower bodies of players since it opened in 2010. The stadium, built for $1.6 billion, has caught constant criticism because of its turf field and the injuries that have come with it.
NFL Players Are Attacked By MetLife Stadium’s Home Turf
Ask a Jets fan what the worst moment in the recent history of the franchise is. Many will say it’s when Aaron Rodgers tore his Achilles on the fourth play of his tenure with the team. New York’s reintroduction as a competitor was cut off before the news could spread.
Countless factors went into Rodgers’ untimely injury. A Leonard Floyd tackle against a 40-year-old who was suffering from a lingering calf injury is a recipe for something to go awry. However, the conversation once again fell to the playing surface that night.
It’s hard to win football games if players are not on the field. It’s even harder to win when the best players in the game don’t want to play at your stadium. NFL players ranked MetLife Stadium as the worst place to play in a 2023 survey done by The Athletic. That blight on the franchise is seen in more than just surveys.
NFL players have evolved. Teams focus on health and longevity more than ever before. These players understand that their performance is how they get paid, so why would they play in a place that hinders their performance?
The NFLPA and players alike have been vocal about their distaste of artificial turf. Players are finding ways to voice their displeasure, whether through social media, interviews or data from years of research.
The argument against turf is a strong one. Owners save money on field costs when using turf but end up losing much more. A team’s home stadium should be a castle they protect, not a minefield where they don’t know the danger zones.
NFL Should Be Accepting Foreign Aid
The World Cup has brought a natural grass oasis to the turf desert of America. Soccer has made its voice heard where football players were ignored. FIFA’s stipulations for natural grass on playing surfaces have been emphasized by soccer players in the MLS. Lionel Messi, Zlatan Ibrahimovic and other European league legends have refused to play on turf surfaces around the league.
This refusal of turf by the rest of the world is showing the NFL what paradise could be. The World Cup has not been marred by injury or turf discourse. It has been able to be enjoyed by players and spectators alike, without worries over the surface of play.
Injuries will always happen, but the steps that were taken for the World Cup are ones that should transition to the NFL. Protecting the product and making sure the best players have the best opportunities to play shouldn’t have to be argued. In a sport that lacks fully guaranteed contracts, players shouldn’t have to fear the surfaces they are playing on.
If these NFL owners are willing to bring in grass for athletes that don’t directly affect their bottom line, why not their own athletes? A little more money on field maintenance could bring millions in revenue. The World Cup has shown these stadiums at their fullest potential — sold out, a party atmosphere and natural grass on the field.
New York’s Grassroots Campaign
The refusal of turf has also shown that MetLife Stadium itself could be a paradise. The stadium that is ranked as the worst place to play in the NFL is hosting the World Cup Final. Madison Square Garden is seen as “The Mecca”. Yankee Stadium is hallowed ground. MetLife is a tarnish on the New York sports name.
It does not need to stay that way. The World Cup has given visions of what could be with one simple change. A switch to grass in MetLife stadium could do wonders in turning the worst place to play in the NFL into a pinnacle of the sport.
Leave a comment